We analysed data from a wide quota sample of the Italian adult population (N = 6,681), collected between April 6 and July 9, 2020, to study the association between participation in allowed and temporarily forbidden outdoor activities and psychological distress during the COVID-19 lockdown and in the following weeks, with the moderation of the perception of the quota of people who were compliant with the measures the government took to combat COVID-19. Participation in allowed outdoor activities was positively associated with psychological distress, while participation in temporarily forbidden outdoor activities was negatively associated with psychological distress. Both associations were stronger among those who believed that a small proportion of people living in their area were following the governmental COVID-19 protocol. Strengths, weaknesses and future developments of this study are discussed.
To go out or not to go out, that was the problem: Did compliance with the formal norms and the perception of the descriptive norms of lockdown alleviate psychological distress in times of COVID-19? / Cavazza, Nicoletta; Roccato, Michele. - In: PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE. - ISSN 1827-2517. - 21:1(2026), pp. 65-78. [10.1482/119972]
To go out or not to go out, that was the problem: Did compliance with the formal norms and the perception of the descriptive norms of lockdown alleviate psychological distress in times of COVID-19?
Nicoletta Cavazza;Michele Roccato
2026
Abstract
We analysed data from a wide quota sample of the Italian adult population (N = 6,681), collected between April 6 and July 9, 2020, to study the association between participation in allowed and temporarily forbidden outdoor activities and psychological distress during the COVID-19 lockdown and in the following weeks, with the moderation of the perception of the quota of people who were compliant with the measures the government took to combat COVID-19. Participation in allowed outdoor activities was positively associated with psychological distress, while participation in temporarily forbidden outdoor activities was negatively associated with psychological distress. Both associations were stronger among those who believed that a small proportion of people living in their area were following the governmental COVID-19 protocol. Strengths, weaknesses and future developments of this study are discussed.Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




