Obtaining informed consent in vulnerable populations like children and adolescents, is a relevant issue and raises ethical concerns. Minors are considered unable to consent to treatment, and permission from guardians is required for them. Nevertheless, several studies have been carried out on the competence of pediatric patients, with mixed results. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to assess children and adolescents’ decisional capacity to consent to treatment. The search strategy identified 2,790 studies, including 10 that survived full-text screening and evaluation. Studies included in the analysis evaluated the decision-making capacity of minors using the MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool - Treatment (MacCAT-T), the Adolescent Psychiatric Patient Competency Questionnaire (CQ-ChP); the Measure of Competency (MOC), the Measure of Competency- Hypothetical (MOC[sbnd]Hyp). Overall, minors over the age of 13 showed an acceptable decisional capacity. However, further research, preferably on larger groups, is needed to shed more light on this topic.

Decisional capacity to consent to treatment in children and adolescents: A systematic review / Parmigiani, Giovanna; Benevento, Marcello; Solarino, Biagio; Margari, Anna; Ferorelli, Davide; Buongiorno, Luigi; Catanesi, Roberto; Carabellese, Felice; Del Casale, Antonio; Ferracuti, Stefano; Mandarelli, Gabriele. - In: PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH. - ISSN 0165-1781. - 344:(2025), pp. 1-9. [10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116343]

Decisional capacity to consent to treatment in children and adolescents: A systematic review

Parmigiani, Giovanna;
2025

Abstract

Obtaining informed consent in vulnerable populations like children and adolescents, is a relevant issue and raises ethical concerns. Minors are considered unable to consent to treatment, and permission from guardians is required for them. Nevertheless, several studies have been carried out on the competence of pediatric patients, with mixed results. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to assess children and adolescents’ decisional capacity to consent to treatment. The search strategy identified 2,790 studies, including 10 that survived full-text screening and evaluation. Studies included in the analysis evaluated the decision-making capacity of minors using the MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool - Treatment (MacCAT-T), the Adolescent Psychiatric Patient Competency Questionnaire (CQ-ChP); the Measure of Competency (MOC), the Measure of Competency- Hypothetical (MOC[sbnd]Hyp). Overall, minors over the age of 13 showed an acceptable decisional capacity. However, further research, preferably on larger groups, is needed to shed more light on this topic.
2025
feb-2025
344
1
9
Decisional capacity to consent to treatment in children and adolescents: A systematic review / Parmigiani, Giovanna; Benevento, Marcello; Solarino, Biagio; Margari, Anna; Ferorelli, Davide; Buongiorno, Luigi; Catanesi, Roberto; Carabellese, Felice; Del Casale, Antonio; Ferracuti, Stefano; Mandarelli, Gabriele. - In: PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH. - ISSN 0165-1781. - 344:(2025), pp. 1-9. [10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116343]
Parmigiani, Giovanna; Benevento, Marcello; Solarino, Biagio; Margari, Anna; Ferorelli, Davide; Buongiorno, Luigi; Catanesi, Roberto; Carabellese, Feli...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Parmigiani_competence children and adolescents.2025.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 951.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
951.86 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1407652
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact