: Evidence on the carcinogenic effects of municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWI) is inconsistent. This meta-analysis assessed associations between exposure to MSWI emissions and cancer risk. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for ecological, case-control, or cohort studies, evaluating cancer-related outcomes in populations exposed to MSWI. Study quality was evaluated. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed when at least three studies reported the same cancer outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and robustness with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses. Nineteen studies (11 ecological, 4 cohort, 4 case-control; 1996-January 2025) were included. Most ecological studies had poor quality, while cohort and case-control designs were fair-good. Meta-analyses showed modest excess risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence and lung cancer mortality, with a low certainty of evidence. For other cancers, no consistent and clear associations were found. Overall, current evidence is uncertain to establish causal links between MSWI exposure and cancer. The predominance of ecological designs, limitations in exposure assessment, and methodological heterogeneity contribute to this imprecision.
Exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators and cancer risk in surrounding populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis / Capitão, C., Santos, O., Martins, R., Fialho, M., Feteira-Santos, R., Santos, R.R., Engel, M., Purece, A., Buekers, J., Filippini, T., Virgolino, A.. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 1382-6689. - 125:(2026), pp. 1-17. [10.1016/j.etap.2026.105078]
Exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators and cancer risk in surrounding populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Filippini, Tommaso;
2026
Abstract
: Evidence on the carcinogenic effects of municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWI) is inconsistent. This meta-analysis assessed associations between exposure to MSWI emissions and cancer risk. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for ecological, case-control, or cohort studies, evaluating cancer-related outcomes in populations exposed to MSWI. Study quality was evaluated. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed when at least three studies reported the same cancer outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and robustness with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses. Nineteen studies (11 ecological, 4 cohort, 4 case-control; 1996-January 2025) were included. Most ecological studies had poor quality, while cohort and case-control designs were fair-good. Meta-analyses showed modest excess risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence and lung cancer mortality, with a low certainty of evidence. For other cancers, no consistent and clear associations were found. Overall, current evidence is uncertain to establish causal links between MSWI exposure and cancer. The predominance of ecological designs, limitations in exposure assessment, and methodological heterogeneity contribute to this imprecision.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1382668926001560-main.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
2.23 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.23 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




